AllRefer Health - Caring for your Well Being  

Home | About | FAQs | Contact Us

AllRefer Channels :: Yellow Pages | Reference | Health  

Health & Medical News  
 Diet & Nutrition
 Diseases & Conditions 
 Health News
 Injuries & Wounds
 Poisons & Overdoses
 Surgery & Procedures 
 Symptoms Guide
 Special Topics
 Tests & Exams
 Pictures & Images
 Medical Encyclopedia

November 2009
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930 

 News Topics
 News Archive
Google
  Web health.allrefer.com   

You are here : AllRefer Health > Health News

Online Genetic Testing Appears to Have Benefits
Lung cancer assessment allays some concerns about how patients interpret results, researchers say.

Tue Jun 30, 2009, 14:00

Story Tools

Printable version

Jun 30, 2009 News


Related News Categories

Smoking Cessation

Genetics

Cancer: Lung


Related News

Firm Says Low-Cost Genome Sequencing Is Possible - Nov 05, 2009

Complete Horse Genome Sequence Revealed - Nov 05, 2009

Genes Linked to 'Pot' Belly - Nov 05, 2009

Gene Discovery Gives Clues to Crohn's Disease, Colitis - Nov 04, 2009

Focused Radiation May Help Some With Lung Cancer - Nov 04, 2009

Switch to 'Light' Cigarettes Makes Quitting Tougher - Nov 03, 2009

Nicotine Patch Plus Lozenge Best for Quitting Smoking - Nov 02, 2009

High Blood Pressure Likely in Alzheimer's Offspring - Nov 02, 2009

Five-Minute Survey Can Help Predict Lung Cancer - Nov 02, 2009

Delays in Lung Cancer Care More Common in Public Hospitals - Nov 02, 2009

Is There a 'Bad Driver' Gene? - Oct 29, 2009

Gene Variants Behind Vulnerability to Yeast Infections - Oct 28, 2009

Stem Cells Coaxed to Make Precursors to Egg, Sperm - Oct 28, 2009

Mapping the Link Between Alcohol, Cancer - Oct 27, 2009

Is Smoking Tougher on Women? - Oct 25, 2009

TUESDAY, June 30 (HealthDay News) -- Online genetic testing for lung cancer appears to offer some benefits to patients, according to U.S. researchers who evaluated the use of an online test among 44 smokers.

"Up until now we have had a clear model for genetic testing. You see a professional genetics counselor, undergo a battery of tests and that professional helps you interpret your results," Saskia Sanderson, who conducted the study while at the social and behavioral research branch of the U.S. National Human Genome Research Institute, said in a news release from the American Association for Cancer Research.

"That model is coming under increasing pressure as more and more genetic information is generated, and as a greater number of genetic tests become available on the Internet," Sanderson added.

"What we found was encouraging in that people who got these online genetic results recalled them correctly, and no one regretted having taken the test, though it is important to remember that this was a small group of select smokers and that others may respond differently," said Sanderson, a postdoctoral fellow in the department of genetics and genomic sciences at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City.

The online test examined in this study assessed the presence or absence of the GSTM1 gene. The absence of the gene has been associated with a slightly increased risk of lung cancer. Half the smokers in the study were missing the gene, and all of them correctly identified themselves as "higher risk." Of those with GSTM1, 55 percent accurately identified themselves as "lower risk," while 41 percent interpreted their results as "average risk."

The patterns of accurate interpretation remained six months after the participants received their genetic test results, which suggests that they retained the information, the study said.

According to the researchers, the participants said they found the test results to be believable, trustworthy, easy to understand, relevant and important. Those who learned they had a higher genetic risk for lung cancer did have a short-term decrease in confidence that quitting smoking could reduce their risk of lung cancer. However, all the participants decided to use at least one of several smoking cessation aids.

The study is published in the July issue of the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

"Genetic information is complex, and there is a risk that providing unfiltered information will result in heightened worry and misinterpretation of results," Jamie Ostroff, chief of behavioral science services at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City and an editorial board member of the journal, said in the news release.

"This pilot study found no harm in undergoing these tests and underscores the importance of conducting future research as to how to best educate smokers about gene-environment risks," Ostroff said.

More information

The U.S. National Library of Medicine has more about genetic testing.

SOURCE: American Association for Cancer Research, news release, June 30, 2009

Copyright © 2009 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.


Today's Top News Stories

Doctors Spending More Time Now With Patients - Nov 09, 2009, 16:00
Quality of care increases with longer doctor visits, researchers add.

To Feel Better, Low-Fat Diet May Be Best - Nov 09, 2009, 16:00
Comparison of plans finds differences in mood despite similar weight loss.

Clinical Trials Update: Nov. 9, 2009 - Nov 09, 2009, 09:47

No Gender Gap Found for Clot-Busting Drug - Nov 09, 2009, 17:00
Plavix helped men and women almost equally, study finds.

Sinus Rinses May Do More Harm Than Good - Nov 09, 2009, 12:00
Researchers find long-term risks, but not all agree.







Featured Topics

Alzheimer's Disease

High Blood Pressure

Crohn's Disease

Impotence

Overactive Bladder


Content Provided by HealthDay

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify.
This site complies to the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.
Copyright © 2009 Par Web Solutions All Rights reserved.
Health Topics: A-Al Am-Az B C-Cj Ck-Cz D E F G H I J K L M N O P-Pl Pm-Pz Q R S-Sl Sm-Sz T U V W X Y Z 0-9
About Us | Help | Privacy Policy | Editorial Policy | Advertising Policy | Accessibility | Terms of Use
Contact Us | Link to Us | User Satisfaction Survey | Healthopedia.com

The information provided herein is intended for your general knowledge only and is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment for specific medical conditions. The information should not be used during any medical emergency or for the diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. A licensed physician should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. Call your local emergency number for all medical emergencies. Use of this online service is subject to the disclaimer and the terms and conditions. Links to other sites are provided for information only -- they do not constitute endorsements of those other sites.
Page Last Updated: 10 Nov, 2009